Judicial AI Assistant

News and research

Court AI news, checked against the source

We cover the judicial use of AI, AI lawsuits and court operations only when a reader can inspect the underlying guidance, order or dataset.

Published and reviewed 2026-07-22. Editorial owner: Judicial AI Assistant.

Current source-led topics

25 June 2026 - Crown Court data update. UK Justice Data published an update showing 80,061 open Crown Court cases at 31 March 2026. We retain the 31 December 2025 year-end figure in our country note for a stable annual comparison.

5 May 2026 - AI and evidence. U.S. Courts described authentication, reliability and foundation questions arising from AI-generated and AI-processed evidence.

31 October 2025 - Judicial AI guidance. The Judiciary of England and Wales published refreshed guidance addressing hallucination, bias, confidentiality and personal responsibility.

What counts as news here

A new official guidance document, published judgment, material docket event or statistical release can qualify. A vendor announcement is labelled as such and does not prove deployment, effectiveness or court approval. Search popularity alone is not evidence that an event occurred.

Corrections and updates

Every item carries a visible review date. When an appeal or amended order changes a case, the case note should preserve the earlier procedural description and add the later status. We do not rewrite an allegation as fact after the headline has travelled.

Follow a topic

Use the AI lawsuits tracker for litigation, Judicial AI for governance and court backlog research for official caseload data. The editorial policy explains source ranking.

Questions and answers

How often is the page updated?

We update when a source warrants it, not to meet an artificial publishing quota. The visible review date shows the current edition.

Do you publish rumours?

No. We may describe a clearly attributed proposal or allegation, but we require an inspectable source and label its status.

Can a company announcement be a source?

It can establish what the company announced, not that the product works or has been adopted by a court. Independent or official evidence is needed for broader claims.